Citation de CelineChaix
According to Ulianov, the agricultural sector of the economy was not to be regarded as an auxiliary component but as the very motor of Russian capitalist development.
There were social ramifications to his analysis. In particular, the centuries-old category oh the peasantry could no longer be applied scientifically. Mort peasants had become proletarians, who had no land or equipment and who existed by selling their labour in a capitalist market. A small minority of the peasantry was rich- and Ulianov designated them as "bourgeois ", as rural capitalists, as kulaki. An intermediate group, the serednyaki, were about to be distributed between the vaste proletariat and the small but dominant kulaki. Thus the agrarian-socialist notions of the solidarity and egalitarism of the peasantry were poppycock. The Russia Empire's immediate prospect was the maturation of an already robust capitalism in town and countryside.
There were social ramifications to his analysis. In particular, the centuries-old category oh the peasantry could no longer be applied scientifically. Mort peasants had become proletarians, who had no land or equipment and who existed by selling their labour in a capitalist market. A small minority of the peasantry was rich- and Ulianov designated them as "bourgeois ", as rural capitalists, as kulaki. An intermediate group, the serednyaki, were about to be distributed between the vaste proletariat and the small but dominant kulaki. Thus the agrarian-socialist notions of the solidarity and egalitarism of the peasantry were poppycock. The Russia Empire's immediate prospect was the maturation of an already robust capitalism in town and countryside.
